WHAT DOES CS EXECUTIVE COMPANY LAW CASE STUDIES PDF MEAN?

What Does cs executive company law case studies pdf Mean?

What Does cs executive company law case studies pdf Mean?

Blog Article

“There is no ocular evidence to show that Muhammad Abbas was murdered by any with the present petitioners. Mere fact that Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Din saw firstly the deceased and after a long way they saw the petitioners going towards the same direction, did not suggest that the petitioners were chasing the deceased or were accompanying him. Such evidence cannot be treated as evidence of final viewed.

93 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to your main case, It is additionally a very well-proven proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is topic for the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to reach at its independent findings about the evidence.

Google Scholar – an unlimited database of state and federal case legislation, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.

Some bodies are specified statutory powers to issue steering with persuasive authority or similar statutory effect, like the Highway Code.

ninety four . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It truly is nicely-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within 90 days. When the appeal is not decided within that timeframe, he/she can then approach the service tribunal to challenge the original order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, given that the ninety times for the department to act has already expired. Within the aforesaid proposition, we've been guided via the decision of the Supreme Court from the case of Dr.

Section 302 from the PPC deals with on the list of most major offenses in criminal law: murder. In this blog post, we will delve into the provisions of Section 302, explore the punishment it involves, and examine some notable case laws related to this particular section.

ninety six . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is actually very well-settled that though looking at the case of regular promotion of civil check here servants, the competent authority has to think about the benefit of each of the suitable candidates and after owing deliberations, to grant promotion to this sort of qualified candidates that are found being most meritorious among them. Because the petitioner was held to become senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was ignored with the respondent department just to extend favor to the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy to the part from the respondent department.

48 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Mobile Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 12 Justice with the Peace u/s 22-A is not obliged to afford a possibility of hearing to your accused party; nor obliged to always or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is required to contemplate all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid machinery of criminal law from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are some of the relevant factors. Read more

The prosecution presented substantial evidence, like eyewitness testimonies and expert forensic analysis, confirming the copyright nature on the seized currency.

In simple terms, the section states that any person who commits intentional murder shall be subjected to the death penalty or life imprisonment, along with a potential fine.

Finally, an important contribution of this case which was accepted for consideration with the Court under Article 184 (three), has become setting a precedent which allows for much easier access into the public to technique the superior courts as well as the subordinate courts on environment related issues.

ten. Without touching the merits on the case in the issue of once-a-year increases during the pensionary emoluments of your petitioner, in terms of policy decision of the provincial government, these types of once-a-year increase, if permissible in the case of employees of KMC, needs further assessment to become made with the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance as a result of funding issues and insufficient adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, necessitating the petitioner to pursue other legal avenues. Read more

This landmark case expanded the fundamental rights to life and dignity by interpreting these rights to encompass the right into a healthy environment. This decision is particularly significant as there aren't any specific provisions inside the Pakistani Constitution regarding environmental protection. In relation to environmental legislation in Pakistan, it really is important that the case established the application with the precautionary principle where there can be a threat to environmental rights, and emphasized the positive obligations with the State in protecting the right to some clean and healthy environment.

competent authority has determined the eligibility of the private respondents and found them for being healthy for promotion. CP dismissed(Promotion)

Report this page